🔗 Share this article

A number of Fortnite players are feeling disappointed, and this isn't because of recent in-game happenings. Fortnite's current mini-season, that brings a Springfield map, has also unveiled a fresh mechanic called sidekicks. It's impossible to ignore that these new companions are adorable. But, the associated prices have left numerous fans stunned at this company's efforts to monetize nearly each part of the gaming experience.

Understanding Companion Pets?

Companions are essentially similar to digital creatures, though with some limitations. Players can give them a name, and these pets will follow your character during a match. These sidekicks are indestructible, and you can pet them. Opposing gamers not in your squad cannot see these pets — and showing off one's companions is arguably half the enjoyment of owning them. Pets are able to be customized with costumes and gestures, however the controversy centers on their appearance. Each pet's main design is only able to be altered one time, at which point that choice becomes final. You can choose a sidekick's fur shade, accent hues, iris tones, pattern, and its body type.

A Costly Personalization System

If a player later choose that you want their sidekick to look a bit altered, you cannot simply continue to modify the appearance. Players must purchase a new companion. And, sidekicks aren't inexpensive. Most players are obtaining the banana-themed sidekick, since it is packaged with this season's reward track. According to unofficial reports, future pets may be priced at anywhere between 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; for reference, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. However, players can rename a companion as many times as you'd like.

Player Response and Comparisons

The majority of pets have not been formally released so far, so the pricing may well be adjusted. But even if the company sets sidekicks more affordable, much of the frustration comes from the fact that players might have to spend for a one kind of sidekick multiple times. For some, the cost structure feels particularly unfair considering the developer has previously added pets that are carried about as part of backpack accessories. Back bling companions do not have a customization limitation and are visible by fellow players in the game. Backpack buddies can't be named or perform emotes, however opposing gamers are able to sometimes engage with them — and this is better than being invisible altogether.

Lack of unique functions and limited engagement choices have numerous players experiencing disappointed. For instance, why is it not possible to you, for example, play fetch with your stylish fruit-themed pet? A few point out that companions sometimes fail to keep up with the user if a match is fast-paced, or observe that the banana pet takes up two spots in the battle pass — which supports the notion that the company is pressuring the community for revenue. Greedy is a term that's appearing often in these conversations, with a number of likening pet monetization to other aggressive monetization models in games like popular sports games. It also doesn't help that certain sidekicks are expected to be pricier than their character skin counterparts.

"PLEASE avoid buy Sidekicks," urges one highly-voted online post that advises fellow gamers to figuratively express disapproval by not spending.

"We understand they're cute," the thread adds, "I know they are enjoyable. I know everyone has been anticipating them. However the monetization focus being shown is disgusting and should not be rewarded."

The Broader Context of Virtual Purchases

In recent years, Fortnite's special occasions and collaborations have expanded in scope and ambition, yet the free-to-play title still needs to generate revenue. Therefore, the total quantity of items users are able to currently buy has become almost overwhelming. In addition to standard items like back accessories, gliders, harvesting tools, and emotes, you could potentially spend cash on shoes, songs, musical tools, building blocks, vehicles, tires, vehicle drift colors, seasonal rewards, and a membership. Sidekicks not only require money, and also bring in a range of fresh revenue options for the developer. It is likely, players will before long be able to pay for things like sidekick appearances, costumes, gestures, and additional engagement features.

Every one of these cosmetics are completely voluntary and unneeded to enjoy the experience, but equipment can nonetheless affect a player's social experience. Younger players, for example, at times face teasing for not wearing flashy sufficiently cool outfits. A comparable situation also transpired when the developer introduced licensed shoes, which can range from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The shoe cost model wasn't well received either, and a few players promised that they'd avoid fall prey to the temptation back then. However in the end, purchasing footwear grew normalized. Today, companion pets are further testing the boundaries of what a player might be prepared to spend to be distinctive amongst the crowd.

What's Ahead for Sidekicks?

Sidekicks are currently a fairly recent addition, and they exist a game that changes regularly. Some players are reporting that they have gotten a questionnaire that assesses how people think about pet mechanics and pricing, which could possibly indicate that the developer's plans are still fluid. But if the game shoes are any indication, sidekicks likely won't get more affordable overall — instead, there may be a broader range of costs to shop.

Ultimately, while certain individuals are raging at the game shop prices, others are feeling only joy for their battle royale pals.